Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs AWS

Based on 806 and 420 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View AWS details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesAWSWinner
Performance3839AWS
Accessibility8988Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6666Tie
TTFB299ms239msAWS
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
AWS
39
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
AWS
88
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
AWS
66
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
AWS
91
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
AWS
72

AWS outperforms Amazon Web Services in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose AWS

Choose AWS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 420 audited AWS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or AWS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or AWS?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or AWS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or AWS?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or AWS?
AWS sites show lower Time to First Byte (239 ms vs 299 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or AWS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWS scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback