Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs AWS CloudFront

Based on 806 and 401 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View AWS CloudFront details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesAWS CloudFrontWinner
Performance3839AWS CloudFront
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6666Tie
TTFB299ms238msAWS CloudFront
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
AWS CloudFront
39
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
AWS CloudFront
89
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
AWS CloudFront
66
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
AWS CloudFront
91
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
AWS CloudFront
72

AWS CloudFront outperforms Amazon Web Services in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in no categories.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services doesn't clearly lead AWS CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose AWS CloudFront

Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 401 audited AWS CloudFront sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AWS CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront?
AWS CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (238 ms vs 299 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or AWS CloudFront for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AWS CloudFront scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback