Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Feroot

Based on 806 and 2 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Feroot details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesFerootWinner
Performance3828Amazon Web Services
Accessibility89100Feroot
Best Practices8796Feroot
SEO9196Feroot
Security6663Amazon Web Services
TTFB299ms269msFeroot
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Feroot
28
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Feroot
100
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Feroot
63
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Feroot
96
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Feroot
71

Feroot outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Feroot

Choose Feroot when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 2 audited Feroot sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Feroot?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Feroot?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Feroot?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Feroot (100 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Feroot?
Feroot sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Feroot?
Feroot sites show lower Time to First Byte (269 ms vs 299 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Feroot for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback