Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs FormAssembly

Based on 772 and 3 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View FormAssembly details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesFormAssemblyWinner
Performance3831Amazon Web Services
Accessibility8890FormAssembly
Best Practices8678Amazon Web Services
SEO9192FormAssembly
Security6565Tie
TTFB298ms78msFormAssembly
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
FormAssembly
31
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
88
FormAssembly
90
Security
Amazon Web Services
65
FormAssembly
65
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
FormAssembly
92
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
FormAssembly
71

Amazon Web Services and FormAssembly are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon Web Services has a composite score of 72 while FormAssembly scores 71.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose FormAssembly

Choose FormAssembly when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 772 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 3 audited FormAssembly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FormAssembly (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly?
FormAssembly sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly?
FormAssembly sites show lower Time to First Byte (78 ms vs 298 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or FormAssembly for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback