Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Google Search Console

Based on 794 and 3802 real audits

MetricAmazon Web ServicesGoogle Search ConsoleWinner
Performance3844Google Search Console
Accessibility8988Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8786Amazon Web Services
SEO9190Amazon Web Services
Security6667Google Search Console
TTFB296ms344msAmazon Web Services
Composite7273Google Search Console
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Google Search Console
44
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Google Search Console
88
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Google Search Console
67
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Google Search Console
90
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Google Search Console
73

Amazon Web Services outperforms Google Search Console in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in performance, security, composite score.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 794 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 3802 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Amazon Web Services sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 344 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Search Console scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback