Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Google Search Console

Based on 864 and 4391 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Google Search Console details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesGoogle Search ConsoleWinner
Performance3847Google Search Console
Accessibility8988Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6769Google Search Console
TTFB334ms366msAmazon Web Services
Composite7375Google Search Console
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Google Search Console
47
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Google Search Console
88
Security
Amazon Web Services
67
Google Search Console
69
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Google Search Console
91
Composite
Amazon Web Services
73
Google Search Console
75

Google Search Console outperforms Amazon Web Services in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Search Console

Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 864 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 4391 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Search Console sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Google Search Console sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console?
Amazon Web Services sites show lower Time to First Byte (334 ms vs 366 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Google Search Console for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Search Console scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback