Based on 794 and 1758 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | Google Workspace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 45 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 66 | 67 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 296ms | 276ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Google Workspace |
Google Workspace outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 794 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 1758 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback