Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Kaltura

Based on 796 and 5 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Kaltura details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesKalturaWinner
Performance3847Kaltura
Accessibility8987Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9190Amazon Web Services
Security6662Amazon Web Services
TTFB296ms364msAmazon Web Services
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Kaltura
47
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Kaltura
87
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Kaltura
62
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Kaltura
90
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Kaltura
71

Amazon Web Services outperforms Kaltura in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Kaltura leads in performance.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kaltura

Choose Kaltura when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 5 audited Kaltura sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Kaltura?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Kaltura sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Kaltura?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Kaltura?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Kaltura?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Kaltura?
Amazon Web Services sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Kaltura for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Kaltura scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback