Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Kasada

Based on 796 and 7 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Kasada details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesKasadaWinner
Performance3826Amazon Web Services
Accessibility8995Kasada
Best Practices8774Amazon Web Services
SEO9196Kasada
Security6662Amazon Web Services
TTFB296ms922msAmazon Web Services
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Kasada
26
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Kasada
95
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Kasada
62
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Kasada
96
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Kasada
71

Amazon Web Services outperforms Kasada in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Kasada leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kasada

Choose Kasada when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 7 audited Kasada sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Kasada?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Kasada?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Kasada?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kasada (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Kasada?
Kasada sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Kasada?
Amazon Web Services sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 922 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Kasada for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback