Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Kevel

Based on 806 and 1 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Kevel details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesKevelWinner
Performance3841Kevel
Accessibility8998Kevel
Best Practices8785Amazon Web Services
SEO91100Kevel
Security6666Tie
TTFB299ms110msKevel
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Kevel
41
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Kevel
98
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Kevel
66
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Kevel
100
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Kevel
71

Kevel outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in best practices, composite score.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kevel

Choose Kevel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 1 audited Kevel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Kevel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Kevel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Kevel?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Kevel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kevel (98 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Kevel?
Kevel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Kevel?
Kevel sites show lower Time to First Byte (110 ms vs 299 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Kevel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Kevel scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback