Based on 806 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | Kustomer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 26 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 82 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 81 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 66 | 72 | Kustomer |
| TTFB | 299ms | 41ms | Kustomer |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Kustomer |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Kustomer in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Kustomer leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kustomer when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 1 audited Kustomer sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback