Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Lunio

Based on 796 and 4 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Lunio details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesLunioWinner
Performance3841Lunio
Accessibility8999Lunio
Best Practices8786Amazon Web Services
SEO9194Lunio
Security6669Lunio
TTFB296ms63msLunio
Composite7275Lunio
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Lunio
41
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Lunio
99
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Lunio
69
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Lunio
94
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Lunio
75

Lunio outperforms Amazon Web Services in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in best practices.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Lunio

Choose Lunio when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 4 audited Lunio sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Lunio?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lunio sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Lunio?
Lunio sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Lunio?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Lunio (99 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Lunio?
Lunio sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Lunio?
Lunio sites show lower Time to First Byte (63 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Lunio for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lunio scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback