Based on 772 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | MaxMind | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 27 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 88 | 91 | MaxMind |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 65 | 66 | MaxMind |
| TTFB | 298ms | 100ms | MaxMind |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | MaxMind |
MaxMind outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MaxMind when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 772 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 3 audited MaxMind sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback