Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Open Graph

Based on 794 and 3359 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Open Graph details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesOpen GraphWinner
Performance3845Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9192Open Graph
Security6666Tie
TTFB296ms358msAmazon Web Services
Composite7274Open Graph
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Open Graph
66
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Open Graph
92
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Amazon Web Services in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in TTFB.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 794 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 3359 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Open Graph?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Open Graph?
Amazon Web Services sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 358 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback