Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs PerimeterX

Based on 796 and 22 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View PerimeterX details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesPerimeterXWinner
Performance3831Amazon Web Services
Accessibility8991PerimeterX
Best Practices8780Amazon Web Services
SEO9195PerimeterX
Security6665Amazon Web Services
TTFB296ms189msPerimeterX
Composite7271Amazon Web Services
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
PerimeterX
31
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
PerimeterX
91
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
PerimeterX
65
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
PerimeterX
95
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
PerimeterX
71

Amazon Web Services outperforms PerimeterX in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). PerimeterX leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PerimeterX

Choose PerimeterX when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 22 audited PerimeterX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PerimeterX (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX?
PerimeterX sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX?
PerimeterX sites show lower Time to First Byte (189 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or PerimeterX for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback