Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Re:amaze

Based on 871 and 1 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Re:amaze details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesRe:amazeWinner
Performance3830Amazon Web Services
Accessibility8985Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8796Re:amaze
SEO91100Re:amaze
Security6785Re:amaze
TTFB333ms102msRe:amaze
Composite7382Re:amaze
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Re:amaze
30
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Re:amaze
85
Security
Amazon Web Services
67
Re:amaze
85
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Re:amaze
100
Composite
Amazon Web Services
73
Re:amaze
82

Re:amaze outperforms Amazon Web Services in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 73). Amazon Web Services leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Re:amaze

Choose Re:amaze when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 871 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 1 audited Re:amaze sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze?
Re:amaze sites score higher on security analysis (85 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze?
Re:amaze sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze?
Re:amaze sites show lower Time to First Byte (102 ms vs 333 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Re:amaze for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback