Based on 794 and 14 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | React Native for Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 35 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 82 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 95 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 66 | 67 | React Native for Web |
| TTFB | 296ms | 687ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Amazon Web Services outperforms React Native for Web in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). React Native for Web leads in best practices, security.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 794 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 14 audited React Native for Web sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback