Based on 806 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | React Native for Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 35 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 83 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 94 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | React Native for Web |
| Security | 66 | 69 | React Native for Web |
| TTFB | 299ms | 617ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | React Native for Web |
React Native for Web outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in performance, accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 16 audited React Native for Web sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback