Based on 864 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | React Native for Web | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 35 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 83 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 94 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | React Native for Web |
| Security | 67 | 69 | React Native for Web |
| TTFB | 334ms | 617ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Amazon Web Services and React Native for Web are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon Web Services has a composite score of 73 while React Native for Web scores 73.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 864 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 16 audited React Native for Web sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback