Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Statsig

Based on 794 and 56 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Statsig details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesStatsigWinner
Performance3830Amazon Web Services
Accessibility8992Statsig
Best Practices8788Statsig
SEO9193Statsig
Security6668Statsig
TTFB296ms247msStatsig
Composite7274Statsig
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Statsig
30
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Statsig
92
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Statsig
68
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Statsig
93
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Statsig
74

Statsig outperforms Amazon Web Services in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in performance.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Statsig

Choose Statsig when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 794 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 56 audited Statsig sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Statsig?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Statsig?
Statsig sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Statsig?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Statsig (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Statsig?
Statsig sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Statsig?
Statsig sites show lower Time to First Byte (247 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Statsig for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon Web Services scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback