Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Sucuri

Based on 796 and 4 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Sucuri details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesSucuriWinner
Performance3849Sucuri
Accessibility8990Sucuri
Best Practices8791Sucuri
SEO9193Sucuri
Security6670Sucuri
TTFB296ms164msSucuri
Composite7277Sucuri
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Sucuri
49
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Sucuri
90
Security
Amazon Web Services
66
Sucuri
70
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Sucuri
93
Composite
Amazon Web Services
72
Sucuri
77

Sucuri outperforms Amazon Web Services in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in no categories.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services doesn't clearly lead Sucuri in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Sucuri

Choose Sucuri when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 4 audited Sucuri sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Sucuri sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Sucuri sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Sucuri (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Sucuri sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Sucuri sites show lower Time to First Byte (164 ms vs 296 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Sucuri for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Sucuri scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback