Skip to content

Amazon Web Services vs Sucuri

Based on 852 and 5 real audits

View Amazon Web Services details | View Sucuri details
MetricAmazon Web ServicesSucuriWinner
Performance3844Sucuri
Accessibility8988Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8785Amazon Web Services
SEO9190Amazon Web Services
Security6772Sucuri
TTFB331ms139msSucuri
Composite7377Sucuri
Performance
Amazon Web Services
38
Sucuri
44
Accessibility
Amazon Web Services
89
Sucuri
88
Security
Amazon Web Services
67
Sucuri
72
SEO
Amazon Web Services
91
Sucuri
90
Composite
Amazon Web Services
73
Sucuri
77

Sucuri outperforms Amazon Web Services in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sucuri

Choose Sucuri when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 852 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 5 audited Sucuri sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Sucuri sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Sucuri sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Amazon Web Services sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Web Services or Sucuri?
Sucuri sites show lower Time to First Byte (139 ms vs 331 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Web Services or Sucuri for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Sucuri scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Web Services may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback