Based on 806 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | Trident AB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 40 | Trident AB |
| Accessibility | 89 | 85 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 98 | Trident AB |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 66 | 74 | Trident AB |
| TTFB | 299ms | 140ms | Trident AB |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Trident AB |
Trident AB outperforms Amazon Web Services in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Trident AB when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 2 audited Trident AB sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback