Based on 44 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Webstore | Turbolinks | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 35 | Turbolinks |
| Accessibility | 89 | 56 | Amazon Webstore |
| Best Practices | 78 | 77 | Amazon Webstore |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Turbolinks |
| Security | 64 | 79 | Turbolinks |
| TTFB | 321ms | 866ms | Amazon Webstore |
| Composite | 71 | 79 | Turbolinks |
Turbolinks outperforms Amazon Webstore in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 71). Amazon Webstore leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Amazon Webstore when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Turbolinks when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 44 audited Amazon Webstore sites and 1 audited Turbolinks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback