Skip to content

amCharts vs core-js

Based on 3 and 1582 real audits

MetricamChartscore-jsWinner
Performance3736amCharts
Accessibility7888core-js
Best Practices8884amCharts
SEO8491core-js
Security6265core-js
TTFB534ms374mscore-js
Composite7172core-js
Performance
amCharts
37
core-js
36
Accessibility
amCharts
78
core-js
88
Security
amCharts
62
core-js
65
SEO
amCharts
84
core-js
91
Composite
amCharts
71
core-js
72

core-js outperforms amCharts in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). amCharts leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose amCharts

Choose amCharts when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited amCharts sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, amCharts or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, amCharts sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, amCharts or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, amCharts or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 78). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, amCharts or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), amCharts or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (374 ms vs 534 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose amCharts or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. amCharts scores higher on overall composite score while amCharts may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback