| Metric | Amobee | AppNexus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 31 | AppNexus |
| Accessibility | 96 | 87 | Amobee |
| Best Practices | 57 | 78 | AppNexus |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 61 | 64 | AppNexus |
| TTFB | 105ms | 337ms | Amobee |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Amobee |
Amobee and AppNexus are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amobee has a composite score of 72 while AppNexus scores 71.
Choose Amobee when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose AppNexus when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Amobee sites and 78 audited AppNexus sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback