| Metric | Amobee | Classy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 27 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 96 | 96 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 57 | 57 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 61 | 61 | Tie |
| TTFB | 105ms | 105ms | Tie |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Amobee and Classy are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amobee has a composite score of 72 while Classy scores 72.
Amobee doesn't clearly lead Classy in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Classy doesn't clearly lead Amobee in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Amobee sites and 1 audited Classy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback