Skip to content

AMP vs GetButton

Based on 48 and 1 real audits

View AMP details | View GetButton details
MetricAMPGetButtonWinner
Performance4833AMP
Accessibility8369AMP
Best Practices8777AMP
SEO9250AMP
Security6677GetButton
TTFB647ms133msGetButton
Composite7375GetButton
Performance
AMP
48
GetButton
33
Accessibility
AMP
83
GetButton
69
Security
AMP
66
GetButton
77
SEO
AMP
92
GetButton
50
Composite
AMP
73
GetButton
75

AMP outperforms GetButton in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 75). GetButton leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose AMP

Choose AMP when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose GetButton

Choose GetButton when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 48 audited AMP sites and 1 audited GetButton sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AMP or GetButton?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, AMP or GetButton?
GetButton sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AMP or GetButton?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AMP (83 vs 69). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AMP or GetButton?
AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 50 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AMP or GetButton?
GetButton sites show lower Time to First Byte (133 ms vs 647 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AMP or GetButton for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AMP scores higher on overall composite score while AMP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback