Skip to content

AMP vs Google AdSense

Based on 72 and 192 real audits

View AMP details | View Google AdSense details
MetricAMPGoogle AdSenseWinner
Performance4844AMP
Accessibility8686Tie
Best Practices8986AMP
SEO9393Tie
Security7067AMP
TTFB620ms507msGoogle AdSense
Composite7674AMP
Performance
AMP
48
Google AdSense
44
Accessibility
AMP
86
Google AdSense
86
Security
AMP
70
Google AdSense
67
SEO
AMP
93
Google AdSense
93
Composite
AMP
76
Google AdSense
74

AMP outperforms Google AdSense in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Google AdSense leads in TTFB.

When to choose AMP

Choose AMP when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google AdSense

Choose Google AdSense when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 72 audited AMP sites and 192 audited Google AdSense sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AMP or Google AdSense?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, AMP or Google AdSense?
AMP sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AMP or Google AdSense?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AMP (86 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AMP or Google AdSense?
AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AMP or Google AdSense?
Google AdSense sites show lower Time to First Byte (507 ms vs 620 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AMP or Google AdSense for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AMP scores higher on overall composite score while AMP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback