Skip to content

AMP vs Google Analytics

Based on 72 and 2374 real audits

View AMP details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAMPGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance4842AMP
Accessibility8687Google Analytics
Best Practices8987AMP
SEO9392AMP
Security7067AMP
TTFB620ms455msGoogle Analytics
Composite7674AMP
Performance
AMP
48
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
AMP
86
Google Analytics
87
Security
AMP
70
Google Analytics
67
SEO
AMP
93
Google Analytics
92
Composite
AMP
76
Google Analytics
74

AMP outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose AMP

Choose AMP when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 72 audited AMP sites and 2374 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AMP or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, AMP or Google Analytics?
AMP sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AMP or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AMP or Google Analytics?
AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AMP or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (455 ms vs 620 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AMP or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AMP scores higher on overall composite score while AMP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback