Skip to content

AMP vs Google Charts

Based on 52 and 5 real audits

View AMP details | View Google Charts details
MetricAMPGoogle ChartsWinner
Performance4843AMP
Accessibility8375AMP
Best Practices8786AMP
SEO9278AMP
Security6671Google Charts
TTFB634ms465msGoogle Charts
Composite7474Tie
Performance
AMP
48
Google Charts
43
Accessibility
AMP
83
Google Charts
75
Security
AMP
66
Google Charts
71
SEO
AMP
92
Google Charts
78
Composite
AMP
74
Google Charts
74

AMP outperforms Google Charts in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Google Charts leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose AMP

Choose AMP when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Charts

Choose Google Charts when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 52 audited AMP sites and 5 audited Google Charts sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, AMP or Google Charts?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, AMP or Google Charts?
Google Charts sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AMP or Google Charts?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AMP (83 vs 75). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AMP or Google Charts?
AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 78 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AMP or Google Charts?
Google Charts sites show lower Time to First Byte (465 ms vs 634 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AMP or Google Charts for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AMP scores higher on overall composite score while AMP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback