Skip to content

AMP vs Priority Hints

Based on 60 and 2151 real audits

View AMP details | View Priority Hints details
MetricAMPPriority HintsWinner
Performance4949Tie
Accessibility8490Priority Hints
Best Practices8890Priority Hints
SEO9393Tie
Security6872Priority Hints
TTFB645ms414msPriority Hints
Composite7577Priority Hints
Performance
AMP
49
Priority Hints
49
Accessibility
AMP
84
Priority Hints
90
Security
AMP
68
Priority Hints
72
SEO
AMP
93
Priority Hints
93
Composite
AMP
75
Priority Hints
77

Priority Hints outperforms AMP in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). AMP leads in no categories.

When to choose AMP

AMP doesn't clearly lead Priority Hints in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Priority Hints

Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 60 audited AMP sites and 2151 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AMP or Priority Hints?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 49 on average).
Which has better security, AMP or Priority Hints?
Priority Hints sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AMP or Priority Hints?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Priority Hints (90 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AMP or Priority Hints?
AMP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AMP or Priority Hints?
Priority Hints sites show lower Time to First Byte (414 ms vs 645 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AMP or Priority Hints for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AMP scores higher on overall composite score while AMP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback