Skip to content

Angular Material vs Q4

Based on 1 and 2 real audits

View Angular Material details | View Q4 details
MetricAngular MaterialQ4Winner
Performance8565Angular Material
Accessibility9296Q4
Best Practices10096Angular Material
SEO10096Angular Material
Security8775Angular Material
TTFB61ms166msAngular Material
Composite8881Angular Material
Performance
Angular Material
85
Q4
65
Accessibility
Angular Material
92
Q4
96
Security
Angular Material
87
Q4
75
SEO
Angular Material
100
Q4
96
Composite
Angular Material
88
Q4
81

Angular Material outperforms Q4 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (88 vs 81). Q4 leads in accessibility.

When to choose Angular Material

Choose Angular Material when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Q4

Choose Q4 when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Angular Material sites and 2 audited Q4 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Angular Material or Q4?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Angular Material sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (85 vs 65 on average).
Which has better security, Angular Material or Q4?
Angular Material sites score higher on security analysis (87 vs 75 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Angular Material or Q4?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Q4 (96 vs 92). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Angular Material or Q4?
Angular Material sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 96 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Angular Material or Q4?
Angular Material sites show lower Time to First Byte (61 ms vs 166 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Angular Material or Q4 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Angular Material scores higher on overall composite score while Angular Material may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback