Skip to content

Angular vs HSTS

Based on 73 and 3294 real audits

View Angular details | View HSTS details
MetricAngularHSTSWinner
Performance3652HSTS
Accessibility8990HSTS
Best Practices9189Angular
SEO8992HSTS
Security6973HSTS
TTFB347ms403msAngular
Composite7478HSTS
Performance
Angular
36
HSTS
52
Accessibility
Angular
89
HSTS
90
Security
Angular
69
HSTS
73
SEO
Angular
89
HSTS
92
Composite
Angular
74
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Angular in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Angular leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Angular

Choose Angular when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 73 audited Angular sites and 3294 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Angular or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Angular or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Angular or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Angular or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Angular or HSTS?
Angular sites show lower Time to First Byte (347 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Angular or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Angular may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback