| Metric | Angular | Squarespace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 36 | Squarespace |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | Squarespace |
| Best Practices | 91 | 97 | Squarespace |
| SEO | 89 | 94 | Squarespace |
| Security | 67 | 71 | Squarespace |
| TTFB | 312ms | 303ms | Squarespace |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | Squarespace |
Squarespace outperforms Angular in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Angular leads in no categories.
Angular doesn't clearly lead Squarespace in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Squarespace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 64 audited Angular sites and 15 audited Squarespace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback