Skip to content

AngularJS vs HSTS

Based on 453 and 2599 real audits

View AngularJS details | View HSTS details
MetricAngularJSHSTSWinner
Performance5348AngularJS
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8488HSTS
SEO7991HSTS
Security7070Tie
TTFB249ms365msAngularJS
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
AngularJS
53
HSTS
48
Accessibility
AngularJS
89
HSTS
89
Security
AngularJS
70
HSTS
70
SEO
AngularJS
79
HSTS
91
Composite
AngularJS
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms AngularJS in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). AngularJS leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose AngularJS

Choose AngularJS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 453 audited AngularJS sites and 2599 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AngularJS or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AngularJS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, AngularJS or HSTS?
AngularJS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AngularJS or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor AngularJS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AngularJS or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 79 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AngularJS or HSTS?
AngularJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (249 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AngularJS or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AngularJS scores higher on overall composite score while AngularJS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback