Skip to content

AngularJS vs HSTS

Based on 437 and 2488 real audits

View AngularJS details | View HSTS details
MetricAngularJSHSTSWinner
Performance5248AngularJS
Accessibility8889HSTS
Best Practices8487HSTS
SEO7991HSTS
Security6969Tie
TTFB242ms353msAngularJS
Composite7475HSTS
Performance
AngularJS
52
HSTS
48
Accessibility
AngularJS
88
HSTS
89
Security
AngularJS
69
HSTS
69
SEO
AngularJS
79
HSTS
91
Composite
AngularJS
74
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms AngularJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). AngularJS leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose AngularJS

Choose AngularJS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 437 audited AngularJS sites and 2488 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, AngularJS or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, AngularJS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, AngularJS or HSTS?
AngularJS sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, AngularJS or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, AngularJS or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 79 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), AngularJS or HSTS?
AngularJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (242 ms vs 353 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose AngularJS or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. AngularJS scores higher on overall composite score while AngularJS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback