Skip to content

Animate.css vs mobile-detect.js

Based on 41 and 2 real audits

View Animate.css details | View mobile-detect.js details
MetricAnimate.cssmobile-detect.jsWinner
Performance4454mobile-detect.js
Accessibility8394mobile-detect.js
Best Practices8877Animate.css
SEO9083Animate.css
Security6573mobile-detect.js
TTFB485ms54msmobile-detect.js
Composite7375mobile-detect.js
Performance
Animate.css
44
mobile-detect.js
54
Accessibility
Animate.css
83
mobile-detect.js
94
Security
Animate.css
65
mobile-detect.js
73
SEO
Animate.css
90
mobile-detect.js
83
Composite
Animate.css
73
mobile-detect.js
75

mobile-detect.js outperforms Animate.css in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Animate.css leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose Animate.css

Choose Animate.css when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose mobile-detect.js

Choose mobile-detect.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 41 audited Animate.css sites and 2 audited mobile-detect.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Animate.css or mobile-detect.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, mobile-detect.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Animate.css or mobile-detect.js?
mobile-detect.js sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Animate.css or mobile-detect.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor mobile-detect.js (94 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Animate.css or mobile-detect.js?
Animate.css sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Animate.css or mobile-detect.js?
mobile-detect.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (54 ms vs 485 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Animate.css or mobile-detect.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. mobile-detect.js scores higher on overall composite score while Animate.css may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback