Skip to content

Ant Design vs core-js

Based on 4 and 1582 real audits

View Ant Design details | View core-js details
MetricAnt Designcore-jsWinner
Performance3336core-js
Accessibility8188core-js
Best Practices8284core-js
SEO8691core-js
Security6165core-js
TTFB357ms374msAnt Design
Composite6872core-js
Performance
Ant Design
33
core-js
36
Accessibility
Ant Design
81
core-js
88
Security
Ant Design
61
core-js
65
SEO
Ant Design
86
core-js
91
Composite
Ant Design
68
core-js
72

core-js outperforms Ant Design in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). Ant Design leads in TTFB.

When to choose Ant Design

Choose Ant Design when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Ant Design sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ant Design or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Ant Design or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ant Design or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ant Design or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ant Design or core-js?
Ant Design sites show lower Time to First Byte (357 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ant Design or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. core-js scores higher on overall composite score while Ant Design may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback