Skip to content

Ant Design vs Yandex.Direct

Based on 5 and 2 real audits

View Ant Design details | View Yandex.Direct details
MetricAnt DesignYandex.DirectWinner
Performance4465Yandex.Direct
Accessibility8369Ant Design
Best Practices8688Yandex.Direct
SEO8891Yandex.Direct
Security6676Yandex.Direct
TTFB298ms186msYandex.Direct
Composite7280Yandex.Direct
Performance
Ant Design
44
Yandex.Direct
65
Accessibility
Ant Design
83
Yandex.Direct
69
Security
Ant Design
66
Yandex.Direct
76
SEO
Ant Design
88
Yandex.Direct
91
Composite
Ant Design
72
Yandex.Direct
80

Yandex.Direct outperforms Ant Design in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 72). Ant Design leads in accessibility.

When to choose Ant Design

Choose Ant Design when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Yandex.Direct

Choose Yandex.Direct when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Ant Design sites and 2 audited Yandex.Direct sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Ant Design or Yandex.Direct?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Yandex.Direct sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (65 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Ant Design or Yandex.Direct?
Yandex.Direct sites score higher on security analysis (76 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Ant Design or Yandex.Direct?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Ant Design (83 vs 69). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Ant Design or Yandex.Direct?
Yandex.Direct sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Ant Design or Yandex.Direct?
Yandex.Direct sites show lower Time to First Byte (186 ms vs 298 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Ant Design or Yandex.Direct for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Yandex.Direct scores higher on overall composite score while Ant Design may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback