Skip to content

Anthology Encompass vs Font Awesome

Based on 1 and 575 real audits

View Anthology Encompass details | View Font Awesome details
MetricAnthology EncompassFont AwesomeWinner
Performance3044Font Awesome
Accessibility9587Anthology Encompass
Best Practices8187Font Awesome
SEO8591Font Awesome
Security6665Anthology Encompass
TTFB432ms453msAnthology Encompass
Composite7173Font Awesome
Performance
Anthology Encompass
30
Font Awesome
44
Accessibility
Anthology Encompass
95
Font Awesome
87
Security
Anthology Encompass
66
Font Awesome
65
SEO
Anthology Encompass
85
Font Awesome
91
Composite
Anthology Encompass
71
Font Awesome
73

Font Awesome outperforms Anthology Encompass in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Anthology Encompass leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

When to choose Anthology Encompass

Choose Anthology Encompass when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Anthology Encompass sites and 575 audited Font Awesome sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome?
Anthology Encompass sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Anthology Encompass (95 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome?
Anthology Encompass sites show lower Time to First Byte (432 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Anthology Encompass or Font Awesome for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Anthology Encompass may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback