Skip to content

Anubis vs Google Workspace

Based on 5 and 1764 real audits

View Anubis details | View Google Workspace details
MetricAnubisGoogle WorkspaceWinner
Performance6545Anubis
Accessibility8588Google Workspace
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO8390Google Workspace
Security6767Tie
TTFB283ms282msGoogle Workspace
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Anubis
65
Google Workspace
45
Accessibility
Anubis
85
Google Workspace
88
Security
Anubis
67
Google Workspace
67
SEO
Anubis
83
Google Workspace
90
Composite
Anubis
74
Google Workspace
74

Google Workspace outperforms Anubis in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Anubis leads in performance.

When to choose Anubis

Choose Anubis when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Workspace

Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Anubis sites and 1764 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Anubis or Google Workspace?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Anubis sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (65 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Anubis or Google Workspace?
Anubis sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Anubis or Google Workspace?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Workspace (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Anubis or Google Workspace?
Google Workspace sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Anubis or Google Workspace?
Google Workspace sites show lower Time to First Byte (282 ms vs 283 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Anubis or Google Workspace for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Anubis scores higher on overall composite score while Anubis may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback