| Metric | AOS | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | AOS |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 448ms | 358ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms AOS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). AOS leads in accessibility.
Choose AOS when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 63 audited AOS sites and 3359 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback