Based on 67 and 1 real audits
| Metric | AOS | Twenty Twenty-One | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 59 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| Accessibility | 90 | 94 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| Best Practices | 86 | 96 | Twenty Twenty-One |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | AOS |
| Security | 67 | 63 | AOS |
| TTFB | 469ms | 503ms | AOS |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Twenty Twenty-One |
Twenty Twenty-One outperforms AOS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). AOS leads in SEO, security, TTFB.
Choose AOS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Twenty-One when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 67 audited AOS sites and 1 audited Twenty Twenty-One sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback