Based on 432 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | imperia CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 62 | imperia CMS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 93 | imperia CMS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 100 | imperia CMS |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | imperia CMS |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 547ms | 480ms | imperia CMS |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | imperia CMS |
imperia CMS outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Apache HTTP Server leads in security.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose imperia CMS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 432 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 2 audited imperia CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback