Skip to content

Apache HTTP Server vs Kaltura

Based on 523 and 5 real audits

View Apache HTTP Server details | View Kaltura details
MetricApache HTTP ServerKalturaWinner
Performance5147Apache HTTP Server
Accessibility8687Kaltura
Best Practices8887Apache HTTP Server
SEO9090Tie
Security6762Apache HTTP Server
TTFB635ms364msKaltura
Composite7471Apache HTTP Server
Performance
Apache HTTP Server
51
Kaltura
47
Accessibility
Apache HTTP Server
86
Kaltura
87
Security
Apache HTTP Server
67
Kaltura
62
SEO
Apache HTTP Server
90
Kaltura
90
Composite
Apache HTTP Server
74
Kaltura
71

Apache HTTP Server outperforms Kaltura in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Kaltura leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Apache HTTP Server

Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kaltura

Choose Kaltura when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 523 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 5 audited Kaltura sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kaltura (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura?
Kaltura sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 635 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache HTTP Server or Kaltura for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache HTTP Server scores higher on overall composite score while Apache HTTP Server may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback