Skip to content

Apache HTTP Server vs Linode/Akamai

Based on 523 and 5 real audits

View Apache HTTP Server details | View Linode/Akamai details
MetricApache HTTP ServerLinode/AkamaiWinner
Performance5169Linode/Akamai
Accessibility8676Apache HTTP Server
Best Practices8893Linode/Akamai
SEO9091Linode/Akamai
Security6763Apache HTTP Server
TTFB635ms600msLinode/Akamai
Composite7473Apache HTTP Server
Performance
Apache HTTP Server
51
Linode/Akamai
69
Accessibility
Apache HTTP Server
86
Linode/Akamai
76
Security
Apache HTTP Server
67
Linode/Akamai
63
SEO
Apache HTTP Server
90
Linode/Akamai
91
Composite
Apache HTTP Server
74
Linode/Akamai
73

Linode/Akamai outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Apache HTTP Server leads in accessibility, security, composite score.

When to choose Apache HTTP Server

Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Linode/Akamai

Choose Linode/Akamai when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 523 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 5 audited Linode/Akamai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linode/Akamai sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (69 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache HTTP Server (86 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai?
Linode/Akamai sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai?
Linode/Akamai sites show lower Time to First Byte (600 ms vs 635 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache HTTP Server or Linode/Akamai for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linode/Akamai scores higher on overall composite score while Apache HTTP Server may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback