Skip to content

Apache HTTP Server vs Matomo Tag Manager

Based on 585 and 39 real audits

View Apache HTTP Server details | View Matomo Tag Manager details
MetricApache HTTP ServerMatomo Tag ManagerWinner
Performance5248Apache HTTP Server
Accessibility8690Matomo Tag Manager
Best Practices8891Matomo Tag Manager
SEO9092Matomo Tag Manager
Security6869Matomo Tag Manager
TTFB645ms306msMatomo Tag Manager
Composite7476Matomo Tag Manager
Performance
Apache HTTP Server
52
Matomo Tag Manager
48
Accessibility
Apache HTTP Server
86
Matomo Tag Manager
90
Security
Apache HTTP Server
68
Matomo Tag Manager
69
SEO
Apache HTTP Server
90
Matomo Tag Manager
92
Composite
Apache HTTP Server
74
Matomo Tag Manager
76

Matomo Tag Manager outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Apache HTTP Server leads in performance.

When to choose Apache HTTP Server

Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Tag Manager

Choose Matomo Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 585 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 39 audited Matomo Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager?
Matomo Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Matomo Tag Manager (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager?
Matomo Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager?
Matomo Tag Manager sites show lower Time to First Byte (306 ms vs 645 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache HTTP Server or Matomo Tag Manager for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache HTTP Server scores higher on overall composite score while Apache HTTP Server may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback