Based on 451 and 2412 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | Microsoft | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 39 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Microsoft |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Apache HTTP Server |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Microsoft |
| TTFB | 548ms | 329ms | Microsoft |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Apache HTTP Server |
Apache HTTP Server outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 451 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback