Based on 453 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | mod_perl | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 99 | mod_perl |
| Accessibility | 87 | 76 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 88 | 100 | mod_perl |
| SEO | 90 | 82 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Security | 65 | 67 | mod_perl |
| TTFB | 551ms | 208ms | mod_perl |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | mod_perl |
mod_perl outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Apache HTTP Server leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose mod_perl when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 453 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 2 audited mod_perl sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback