Skip to content

Apache HTTP Server vs Raphael

Based on 453 and 5 real audits

View Apache HTTP Server details | View Raphael details
MetricApache HTTP ServerRaphaelWinner
Performance5066Raphael
Accessibility8768Apache HTTP Server
Best Practices8894Raphael
SEO9084Apache HTTP Server
Security6570Raphael
TTFB551ms467msRaphael
Composite7375Raphael
Performance
Apache HTTP Server
50
Raphael
66
Accessibility
Apache HTTP Server
87
Raphael
68
Security
Apache HTTP Server
65
Raphael
70
SEO
Apache HTTP Server
90
Raphael
84
Composite
Apache HTTP Server
73
Raphael
75

Raphael outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Apache HTTP Server leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Apache HTTP Server

Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Raphael

Choose Raphael when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 453 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 5 audited Raphael sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache HTTP Server or Raphael?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Raphael sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, Apache HTTP Server or Raphael?
Raphael sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache HTTP Server or Raphael?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache HTTP Server (87 vs 68). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache HTTP Server or Raphael?
Apache HTTP Server sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache HTTP Server or Raphael?
Raphael sites show lower Time to First Byte (467 ms vs 551 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache HTTP Server or Raphael for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Raphael scores higher on overall composite score while Apache HTTP Server may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback