Based on 519 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | Skrollr | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 36 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Accessibility | 86 | 78 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 88 | 75 | Apache HTTP Server |
| SEO | 90 | 88 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 628ms | 958ms | Apache HTTP Server |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Apache HTTP Server |
Apache HTTP Server outperforms Skrollr in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Skrollr leads in no categories.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Skrollr doesn't clearly lead Apache HTTP Server in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 519 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 8 audited Skrollr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback