Based on 535 and 83 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | Ubuntu | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 54 | Ubuntu |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 89 | 91 | Ubuntu |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Ubuntu |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 641ms | 484ms | Ubuntu |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Ubuntu |
Ubuntu outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Apache HTTP Server leads in no categories.
Apache HTTP Server doesn't clearly lead Ubuntu in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Ubuntu when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 535 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 83 audited Ubuntu sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback