Based on 585 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Apache HTTP Server | WebSite X5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 56 | WebSite X5 |
| Accessibility | 86 | 85 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 88 | 98 | WebSite X5 |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | WebSite X5 |
| Security | 68 | 75 | WebSite X5 |
| TTFB | 645ms | 916ms | Apache HTTP Server |
| Composite | 74 | 79 | WebSite X5 |
WebSite X5 outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). Apache HTTP Server leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WebSite X5 when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 585 audited Apache HTTP Server sites and 2 audited WebSite X5 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback