Based on 5 and 3415 real audits
| Metric | Apache Tomcat | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 94 | 89 | Apache Tomcat |
| Best Practices | 83 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | Apache Tomcat |
| Security | 63 | 66 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 230ms | 365ms | Apache Tomcat |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Apache Tomcat in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Apache Tomcat leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Apache Tomcat when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Apache Tomcat sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback